|
|
Post by Corbray on Feb 9, 2020 14:52:37 GMT
worth a shot as we're not defending well and keep getting caught out.
i was thinking a formation like ...
kelly
masterson hall barbet
kane wallace as wingbacks
bos amos chair
eze
hugill
bos, chair and eze to all alternate and regularly switch positions and move across the final third but with eze being mostly in a free role. kane doesn't look great in defence and most people think he'd be a better winger than a RB so maybe having him able to push up more with 3 CBs behind him might get better use of his style of play.
bos and chair both do a lot of running, pressing and covering so would be handy to have around whilst amos can stay more centrally as cover for the attacking trio. all our CBs are good with the ball so should be confident enough to push up into the midfield better
|
|
|
|
Post by Tarbie on Feb 9, 2020 15:08:30 GMT
Wouldn't be against mixing things up a bit. That said, regardless of what we do, I think we are probably destined for quite a depressing last 15 games without Nakhi Wells'goals!
|
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on Feb 9, 2020 15:13:44 GMT
Wouldn't be against mixing things up a bit. That said, regardless of what we do, I think we are probably destined for quite a depressing last 15 games with Nakhi Wells'goals! I think he'd have done better with the Hugill chance yesterday |
|
|
|
Post by BrightonR on Feb 9, 2020 15:26:13 GMT
The less at the back constantly fucking up, the better IMO. 😂
|
|
|
|
Post by Shania on Feb 9, 2020 17:53:55 GMT
Mannning instead of Amos. Manning can shoot. Amos looks tired..
|
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Feb 9, 2020 18:26:57 GMT
Hurts me to say but if your going out and out wing back then you prob have to play manning. I personally don’t think he’s good enough to play the roll but would be better then Wallace bombing up and down. Would be car crash in defence but would suit him going forwards
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2020 9:16:32 GMT
We should be looking at whether BOS or Clarke can play through the middle as Hugill is not good enough a finisher to secure the points needed to make sure of safety. We need to get out of the habit of losing and fast as we could easily get sucked in due to a lack of goals.
|
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on Feb 10, 2020 9:22:23 GMT
And we need to find out quickly if Oteh is going to cut it. I'm hoping he does.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tarbie on Feb 10, 2020 9:53:00 GMT
We should be looking at whether BOS or Clarke can play through the middle as Hugill is not good enough a finisher to secure the points needed to make sure of safety. We need to get out of the habit of losing and fast as we could easily get sucked in due to a lack of goals. I was even wondering whilst watching this weekend whether Eze up top might be worth trying? Maybe play him off Hugill in a 4-4-2 initially. Hugill on his own isn't really cutting it. Plus there are bound to be games he will miss through injuries and suspension. We really need to be thinking about our other options. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2020 10:08:15 GMT
We should be looking at whether BOS or Clarke can play through the middle as Hugill is not good enough a finisher to secure the points needed to make sure of safety. We need to get out of the habit of losing and fast as we could easily get sucked in due to a lack of goals. I was even wondering whilst watching this weekend whether Eze up top might be worth trying? Maybe play him off Hugill in a 4-4-2 initially. Hugill on his own isn't really cutting it. Plus there are bound to be games he will miss through injuries and suspension. We really need to be thinking about our other options. 100% Tarbie. For all the easy on the eye stuff that we play at times we are just not good or solid enough at the back and clinical up top. Hugill is a slightly more mobile version of Smith and is never a 10 million pound footballer. We need to change and quickly as we just do not pick up enough points. |
|
