|
|
Brum
Mar 18, 2019 12:38:00 GMT
Post by croydoncaptainjack on Mar 18, 2019 12:38:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 18, 2019 13:03:53 GMT
via mobile
Post by West Acton on Mar 18, 2019 13:03:53 GMT
If I was Blues I would demand any deduction this season as they will be safe. Starting 12points down next season would be a death sentence
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 18, 2019 13:32:37 GMT
via mobile
Post by croydoncaptainjack on Mar 18, 2019 13:32:37 GMT
If I was Blues I would demand any deduction this season as they will be safe. Starting 12points down next season would be a death sentence Yes, I agree. Would be a result for us if it was next season though. Every cloud eh. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Brum
Mar 18, 2019 18:43:48 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2019 18:43:48 GMT
How much were Wolves done for buying promotion? Any transfer ban?
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 18, 2019 19:00:11 GMT
via mobile
Post by West Acton on Mar 18, 2019 19:00:11 GMT
How much were Wolves done for buying promotion? Any transfer ban? guessing they will get slap if/when they drop. That’s what happened to us |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Brum
Mar 18, 2019 19:16:44 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2019 19:16:44 GMT
Unlikely to drop though for the forseeable which makes a mockery of the ruling. 100 million worth of players in the championship shows that. Any fine is offset by the revenue gained for gaining promotion.
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 18, 2019 20:02:19 GMT
via mobile
Post by West Acton on Mar 18, 2019 20:02:19 GMT
Unlikely to drop though for the forseeable which makes a mockery of the ruling. 100 million worth of players in the championship shows that. Any fine is offset by the revenue gained for gaining promotion. but that should have been us mate but we entrusted the charleton and made the same mistakes as before. Only ourselves to blame |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 18, 2019 20:06:28 GMT
Wolves have Mendes and we had Kia which was ultimately put us where we are now. Yes Redknapp was involved but 2012 summer was where it all started
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 19, 2019 9:54:04 GMT
Post by croydoncaptainjack on Mar 19, 2019 9:54:04 GMT
How much were Wolves done for buying promotion? Any transfer ban? They lost £52 million in that season but because they went up they are not subject to the FFP rules. This is the gamble a lot of clubs are taking and they can't all go up. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Brum
Mar 19, 2019 14:22:24 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2019 14:22:24 GMT
They can and will when they sign Neves and Jota to name two.
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 11:37:07 GMT
Post by croydoncaptainjack on Mar 22, 2019 11:37:07 GMT
Nine point deduction this season apparently.
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 11:49:02 GMT
via mobile
Post by West Acton on Mar 22, 2019 11:49:02 GMT
So there now on 41points
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 12:14:34 GMT
Post by acricketer on Mar 22, 2019 12:14:34 GMT
Why points and not a fine? Why are FFP punishments not consistent?
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 12:35:17 GMT
Post by bluehoop on Mar 22, 2019 12:35:17 GMT
Why points and not a fine? Why are FFP punishments not consistent? I think this is the first punishment delivered under the "new" FFP rules? More about ongoing sustainability: for every pound they earn they are spending £2.65 or something like that. It's all bs and I think they make it up as they go along  |
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 12:48:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by Ginger Ninja on Mar 22, 2019 12:48:31 GMT
Does that include a sanction for breaching their transfer embargo last summer? They signed Pedersen when they were under embargo, and it was being investigated separately I think.
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 13:00:06 GMT
Post by acricketer on Mar 22, 2019 13:00:06 GMT
If a team breaching FFP can't withstand a 9 point deduction what's the world coming to? After all they paid for those points.
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 13:57:22 GMT
Post by Hertford Hoop on Mar 22, 2019 13:57:22 GMT
Will make them sit up and think for the last 8 games. May have a real negative affect on them, I'd blame the tool who ran on the pitch a few weeks back
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 16:37:13 GMT
Post by hal9thou on Mar 22, 2019 16:37:13 GMT
Why points and not a fine? Why are FFP punishments not consistent? Because - you guessed it - the rules have changed. This isn't an FFP sanction. This is the first sanction under EFL 'sustainability' rules. You could argue that in changing the santion format from FFP the EFL themselves are not playing with a particularly straight bat since arguably FFP sanctions were harsher, although that is hard to quantify. |
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 20:27:34 GMT
Post by Stanley75 on Mar 22, 2019 20:27:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 22, 2019 22:14:13 GMT
Post by acricketer on Mar 22, 2019 22:14:13 GMT
Basically the message is spend enough so that 9 points doesn't matter.
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 23, 2019 7:27:56 GMT
via mobile
Post by West Acton on Mar 23, 2019 7:27:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 23, 2019 8:58:22 GMT
via mobile
Post by Tarbie on Mar 23, 2019 8:58:22 GMT
The next couple of seasons in the Championship will be interesting. Lots of sides are going to fall foul of FFP, and salaries will drop across the board. The big negative is that the gulf between the Premier League and the rest is only going to get bigger, and sides that go up will most likely be scared of spending money. |
|
|
|
Brum
Mar 23, 2019 10:13:05 GMT
Post by lymehoop on Mar 23, 2019 10:13:05 GMT
I don't think there will be anywhere near the money bandied out for football rights from the likes of Sky and BT. That will rein in the immoral amounts paid in wages and especially agents fees
|
|
