|
Post by The General on Jun 11, 2024 21:08:05 GMT
Truth is they want to sell the land
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on Jun 11, 2024 21:12:48 GMT
Just build it slightly higher not much a bit New stadium on the same footprint but higher Its not rocket science is it really New stadium 25k capacity Cant see why its such and issue Unless they don’t really want it hmmmm Is it worth spending 100mil to increase capacity by 7k ? No. That’s point made by Hoos many times
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Jun 12, 2024 6:41:53 GMT
I thought Ruben said at recent fans forum stadium ambition was more moderate then initial plans and they were looking at 25k
Surely it’s cheaper to build a 25k stadium (if possible) on the site where you already own the land where the only cost is the build then having to spend money on new plot of land and the construction costs?
Brentford, Luton and Bournemouth proving don’t need huge stadiums to be in prem so even 20k with decent facilities and corporate etc would do the job.
Personally don’t think we need more than 25k max so anything more if that’s what fans are hoping for imo is just waste of economies of scales.
|
|
|
Post by Hertfordshire Ranger on Jun 12, 2024 7:10:17 GMT
I still think that the most likely scenario is the site of the old Macro retail outlet. Just across the road to HS2 /Old Oak Station, just down the road from Willesden Junction and East Acton stations. No residential, or green belt issues. Surrounded by railway lines / bus garages and little else. Makro was demolished to make way for an HS2 depot, one of many, they will not need them all throughout. When they clear out... Oh, and apparently it is Ealing Council not H&F - and they owe us one for Warren Farm! Of course, the land will be valuable for housing given the proximity to transport - but therein lies the problem for any site for us. But compare and contrast the hurdles there with the Linford Christie hurdles. The issue remains though, have our owners got the appetite for it still? good insight. tbh if i were the owners i would want to sell up BUT recoup as much money as possible. sure we could become a prem club but the elephant in the room is LR. i love LR, it's our home, has great atmosphere and all the history associated with it however it is a shit hole lol. when i went to coventry away last season it felt like i had just come from a mud hut in a third world country, the difference is night and day lol. if i were the owners and wanting to sell then getting a new stadium sorted out or at least the wheels in motion would be paramount for any sale tbh. Yes, the owners may well have a misplaced love of being football club owners, but fundamentally, they are businessmen. Any new stadium has to make commercial sense to them, and most options do not make any financial sense at all. If you look at the history, the Car Giant idea was grounded in the HS2 regeneration. They even bought property next to the depot to provide a bridge to the Car Giant area. They thought they could just take over the Car Giant land, whose owners could see similar value in remaining there. I think their tactics and approach was arrogant and misplaced. Then we have the long running saga of Linford Christie. The relationship with H&F has been dreadful. H&F not covered themselves in glory either, but it would seem that QPR wanted to build and own the community land and build a commercial enterprise for profit, probably with borrowed money from supporters. Fair enough, but that takes some persuasion given all the covenants and interested parties. Their biggest lever was that the existing stadium was costing the council money to maintain. But despite consultations and feasibility studies, it has never really got off the ground. I can never see it happening, it has way too many hurdles to climb. Then we have Warren Farm. Millions wasted, they were outsmarted by the locals, I do not blame our owners for anything other than flogging a dead horse for too long in Ealing, but when you have spent a lot of money, it is really hard to stop and pull the plug. Full marks for Heston, although it was achieved with a supporter's bond - as would any new stadium. But as others have said, any new stadium will have to include a mix of commercial, community and ecological solutions. And then still make money for our owners. That is a tough ask, and why I think that only discarded HS2 offers any real possibility. In the meantime, we have been told it is all about improving Loftus Road. We all love it, we love the atmosphere that can be generated, we love our memories there, our closeness to the action, how quaint it is compared to soulless new stadiums, the noise coming from Q, P & R blocks, Jude the cat and all that history (I was born in Queens Park), our bruised knees, our iron girders obstructing the view, the queues for the toilets, the catering, the time it takes to get out of Ellerslie Road, the dreadful parking, the West London traffic....oh hang on a minute, I think I lost my way there LOL
|
|
|
Post by The General on Jun 12, 2024 10:39:24 GMT
I thought Ruben said at recent fans forum stadium ambition was more moderate then initial plans and they were looking at 25k Surely it’s cheaper to build a 25k stadium (if possible) on the site where you already own the land where the only cost is the build then having to spend money on new plot of land and the construction costs? Brentford, Luton and Bournemouth proving don’t need huge stadiums to be in prem so even 20k with decent facilities and corporate etc would do the job. Personally don’t think we need more than 25k max so anything more if that’s what fans are hoping for imo is just waste of economies of scales. Exactly this we already have the land build a 25k new stadium and shut the fuck up We are a small club 25k is perfect for us no land fees get support from council Truth is Westy that they want the LR land to build houses on mate
|
|
|
Post by spongeparr on Jun 12, 2024 14:28:04 GMT
Just build it slightly higher not much a bit New stadium on the same footprint but higher Its not rocket science is it really New stadium 25k capacity Cant see why its such and issue Unless they don’t really want it hmmmm A few problems with it. One is height. We can't go higher due to the light for the houses. We can't go lower due to the watertable (I heard that anyway, no idea if true) but also, the lower you go, the less space there is. Our pitch is already as small as allowed. Lastly, the gradient of our stands wouldn't be approved if re built, so our ground would be smaller. I personally think 30k is about right. Gives us room for bigger events to be held and also means when we get the Prem, we can bring in more. a 30k stadium would only be around top 30 in size in England. Around 30k is pretty common (Forest, Derby, Coventry, Southampton etc all have aound 30 and thats without googling it. Only get 1 chance at a new stadium. I wouldnt want to waste it by having a lack of ambition of always thinking we'll sell what we sell now. Don't forget, many people dont turn up to LR due to facilities when full or due to the view. Attendances will naturally grow.
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Jul 26, 2024 13:44:20 GMT
Now this is an interesting move
|
|
|
Post by spongeparr on Jul 26, 2024 13:50:26 GMT
Now this is an interesting move Didn't see that one coming, but I am all for it. Not sure on logistics and probably won't happen but is this part of a next phase of moving the family stand there and increasing the safe standing in the Loft? Bit of a leap I know.
|
|
|
Post by surreychad on Jul 26, 2024 14:27:41 GMT
make our home as loud as we can.
|
|
|
Post by stainrodisalegend on Jul 26, 2024 14:34:04 GMT
So question for any builders/ architects on here - when we are so short of capacity, if we take on the bottom tier of that ludicrously named stand for home fans that's great, but the first few rows have to be empty for fear of away fans throwing projectiles on them from above. So that's a lot of revenue we will lose. So how expensive would it be to add perspex or similar sheeting over that area so we could sell those seats? Surely not fortunes? If we are staying at Loftus Rd this is surely a cheap fix that ups capacity.
|
|
|
Post by spongeparr on Jul 26, 2024 14:43:08 GMT
Would selling those seats mean that we need to offer more to away fans, for the percentages? Top tier must be enough with the loss of the bottom but if we sold all of those seats then do we fall below the % threshold of away fans?
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Jul 26, 2024 15:43:10 GMT
So question for any builders/ architects on here - when we are so short of capacity, if we take on the bottom tier of that ludicrously named stand for home fans that's great, but the first few rows have to be empty for fear of away fans throwing projectiles on them from above. So that's a lot of revenue we will lose. So how expensive would it be to add perspex or similar sheeting over that area so we could sell those seats? Surely not fortunes? If we are staying at Loftus Rd this is surely a cheap fix that ups capacity. I dont know why we take seats out as you go other away grounds and they don’t do that home and away fans are above and below each other. It seems a QPR thing to do as no one else does it.
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Jul 26, 2024 15:44:43 GMT
Also surely makes more sense if we insist on cordoning off to take out the front row of the upper tier so can sell whole of bottom.
|
|
|
Post by Bill on Jul 26, 2024 15:50:41 GMT
So question for any builders/ architects on here - when we are so short of capacity, if we take on the bottom tier of that ludicrously named stand for home fans that's great, but the first few rows have to be empty for fear of away fans throwing projectiles on them from above. So that's a lot of revenue we will lose. So how expensive would it be to add perspex or similar sheeting over that area so we could sell those seats? Surely not fortunes? If we are staying at Loftus Rd this is surely a cheap fix that ups capacity. I dont know why we take seats out as you go other away grounds and they don’t do that home and away fans are above and below each other. It seems a QPR thing to do as no one else does it. Because years back Stoke City fans were spitting on families with kids as well as other bodily fluids on the those below.
|
|
|
Post by Bill on Jul 26, 2024 15:53:48 GMT
Also surely makes more sense if we insist on cordoning off to take out the front row of the upper tier so can sell whole of bottom. Good idea not sure it would be in line with away fans quota. Also away fans could still lob whatever down on our fans. Kids for a quid dont know if they still do that.
|
|
|
Post by spongeparr on Jul 26, 2024 16:03:28 GMT
Also surely makes more sense if we insist on cordoning off to take out the front row of the upper tier so can sell whole of bottom. Comes back to my point about the % of away fans to the capacity. As we are below 20k stadium, we have to offer minimum 10% of the capacity. Our ground is what, around 18.5k? Not sure what the top tier holds but must be around the 1.8k mark?
|
|
|
Post by itsonlyagame on Jul 26, 2024 16:06:17 GMT
So question for any builders/ architects on here - when we are so short of capacity, if we take on the bottom tier of that ludicrously named stand for home fans that's great, but the first few rows have to be empty for fear of away fans throwing projectiles on them from above. So that's a lot of revenue we will lose. So how expensive would it be to add perspex or similar sheeting over that area so we could sell those seats? Surely not fortunes? If we are staying at Loftus Rd this is surely a cheap fix that ups capacity. Fuck all that, just handcuff the away fans hands behind their backs as they enter the ground.
|
|
|
Post by stainrodisalegend on Jul 26, 2024 16:22:24 GMT
I dont know why we take seats out as you go other away grounds and they don’t do that home and away fans are above and below each other. It seems a QPR thing to do as no one else does it. Because years back Stoke City fans were spitting on families with kids as well as other bodily fluids on the those below. Yes vaguely remember that Bill, it was years ago right? Typical Stoke fans - only semi-human. How about the other way round then - make the upper tier a home family stand and lower tier away fans? Apologies if that a dumb question, maybe capacity too low down there?
|
|
|
Post by Corbray on Jul 26, 2024 16:39:51 GMT
Because years back Stoke City fans were spitting on families with kids as well as other bodily fluids on the those below. Yes vaguely remember that Bill, it was years ago right? Typical Stoke fans - only semi-human. How about the other way round then - make the upper tier a home family stand and lower tier away fans? Apologies if that a dumb question, maybe capacity too low down there? think lower tier would always be better for home fans tbh. the team will see friends and support everywhere they look whereas the away side will only see enemies. it could end up feeling very hostile for away sides.
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on Jul 26, 2024 17:17:09 GMT
Because years back Stoke City fans were spitting on families with kids as well as other bodily fluids on the those below. Yes vaguely remember that Bill, it was years ago right? Typical Stoke fans - only semi-human. How about the other way round then - make the upper tier a home family stand and lower tier away fans? Apologies if that a dumb question, maybe capacity too low down there? How about up and down to one side like, say, City? Open out to SA Rd. Lower tier at Forest and, in the past, Bramall Lane for example not a pleasant experience.
|
|
|
Post by Hitman34 on Jul 26, 2024 17:37:14 GMT
Now this is an interesting move Not surprised. The demand is sky high. Lower loft safe standing is 90% sold out with season tickets. Also r block standing section. Club really needs to look at extending safe standing in the lower loft end.
|
|
|
Post by The General on Jul 26, 2024 17:58:29 GMT
Love this decision another good one
Just make the ground home fans only 🤣
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Jul 26, 2024 18:21:17 GMT
I dont know why we take seats out as you go other away grounds and they don’t do that home and away fans are above and below each other. It seems a QPR thing to do as no one else does it. Because years back Stoke City fans were spitting on families with kids as well as other bodily fluids on the those below. but I’m sure that’s not just unique to us I really don’t get why we condone off. Wolves, Arsenal, spurs, Sheff Utd, Birmingham, West Ham at Upton Park, Liverpool and forest all grounds where opposition fans sit above and below without cordoning off seats. We’re only ones that do it. If we had the numbers putting home upstairs and away down would be ideal or even spilt top and bottom like at Chelsea home one side away other if facilities allowed.
|
|
|
Post by spongeparr on Jul 26, 2024 19:00:55 GMT
Never been upper School End but lower school only has 1 bar and toilets. Couldn’t go half and half for that reason.
|
|
|
Post by spongeparr on Jul 26, 2024 19:06:08 GMT
Either it has sold very well or we have released only 2 blocks there? Bit odd.
|
|
|
Post by acricketer on Jul 26, 2024 21:20:30 GMT
Glad they've renamed the stand. It was starting look a little bit down at heel.
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on Jul 26, 2024 21:36:41 GMT
Boom boom…
|
|
|
Post by spongeparr on Aug 5, 2024 11:23:17 GMT
Can't buy seats there for WBA game. Had we already sold to WBA or something?
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Oct 19, 2024 7:39:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Timmy Doc on Oct 19, 2024 7:52:48 GMT
Pints today £5 before 2 pm.
|
|