|
|
Post by itsonlyagame on Mar 20, 2024 6:37:47 GMT
Cue pundits discussing whether a player was wrongly given offside because of a trailing fingertip preventing clear daylight.
|
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on Mar 20, 2024 7:21:40 GMT
I actually agree with this. Clear daylight between players = offside. None = onside. Plain and clear and stops all this lines bollox and goals being ruled out for someone's nose being too long. in line always was onside before they started tinkering so it’s just going back to the old law really |
|
|
|
Post by itsonlyagame on Mar 20, 2024 9:16:50 GMT
I actually agree with this. Clear daylight between players = offside. None = onside. Plain and clear and stops all this lines bollox and goals being ruled out for someone's nose being too long. in line always was onside before they started tinkering so it’s just going back to the old law really Exactly. As always it takes years of tinkering to end up concluding that the old way was best after all. |
|
|
|
Post by Corbray on Mar 20, 2024 9:59:46 GMT
there will still be cock ups as there always is.
be interesting to see how the game changes though with these new rules. we'll likely see shorter and more pacey CBs.
|
|
|
|
Post by 2Loftus on Mar 20, 2024 11:02:37 GMT
Absolutely ludicrous.
A line will always have to be drawn, wherever it is, so there will continue to be the same number of mistakes and same level of uproar/outrage as there has always been.
The only way to get over that is for players to wear some kind of tech device or for there to be some sort of overhead scanning/AI system which can scan/read player positions.
Is the offside law even necessary? We'd see a lot more goals without it...
|
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Mar 20, 2024 11:08:06 GMT
Is inline not onside in current laws?
|
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on Mar 20, 2024 11:12:26 GMT
Is inline not onside in current laws? Yes but a toecap offside was ‘level’ before VAR. no way could a lino be so accurate so now saying ‘clear daylight’ is pretty much the old law. |
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Mar 20, 2024 11:38:56 GMT
Fair point suppose old way of officiating allowed human error but VAR allows laws to be implemented as they are written. On that basis the problem is not VAR but how the law is written.
It is frustrating waiting for some outcomes apparently took 6mins for one decision at weekend.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stanley75 on Mar 20, 2024 12:34:35 GMT
Is the offside law even necessary? We'd see a lot more goals without it... From goal-hangers? |
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on May 18, 2024 16:45:23 GMT
This might be better approach like cricket where it works a treat.
|
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on May 18, 2024 16:53:12 GMT
Get ex-players on the VAR panel
|
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on May 18, 2024 17:40:46 GMT
Get ex-players on the VAR panel make no difference I’ve seen ex pros disagreeing same incident. |
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on May 18, 2024 21:36:45 GMT
That’s good, if there’s no agreement it’s not clear and obvious error so onfield stands.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bill on May 19, 2024 11:10:28 GMT
Just go back to the original rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by Corbray on May 19, 2024 12:59:44 GMT
Just go back to the original rule. they seem to just overcomplicate it and constantly tweak the rule. it'd be like me telling you to do an overhand knot but then saying it's all wrong, you've got to grab the left string first, read a bible verse to it and then do the knot. but then actually you've done it wrong as the string should be red, not green. just keep VAR and the rules as simple as possible, relax the strict oversight of the rules and use a modicum of common sense. |
|
|
|
Post by jfrabbit on May 20, 2024 5:50:34 GMT
Get rid of VAR and lets get back to bursting blood vessels at shit decisions like the good old days
|
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Jul 25, 2024 8:02:24 GMT
VAR decision took an hour in Olympics apparently 😂😂😂
|
|
|
|
Post by gtleighsr3 on Jul 25, 2024 8:08:27 GMT
VAR decision took an hour in Olympics apparently 😂😂😂 on radio said more like 2🫣 |
|
|
|
Post by Ginger Ninja on Jul 25, 2024 8:10:57 GMT
VAR decision took an hour in Olympics apparently 😂😂😂 Game was suspended for 2hrs because of crowd trouble. They had to empty the stadium before play resumed. |
|
|
|
Post by hal9thou on Jul 25, 2024 12:41:29 GMT
VAR decision took an hour in Olympics apparently 😂😂😂 And they still got it wrong, because both coaches were informed that the match had ended, and the IOC deemed the match to have been played by publishing the result. Unbelievable dog's breakfast. On VAR itself the problem is that the technology is not sufficient to guarantee correct decisions, as discussed in the Euros thread. And that's before anyone has to interpret it. My personal preference would be to scrap it and introduce clear daylight for offsides. You'd still get errors but we get them with VAR plus all the hanging around. |
|
|
|
Post by Hertfordshire Ranger on Aug 8, 2024 7:49:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by alanwycombe on Aug 8, 2024 8:47:21 GMT
Non-deliberate handball yet body unjustifiably bigger + DOGSO = penalty + caution
How much more of this bollocks are they going to come out with? What does ‘unjustifiably bigger’ mean? If your silhouette (shit, I’m at it now😁) is, shall we say stretched out, because you are reaching for the ball or a tackle then clearly it is non-deliberate. Charlie Austin was unjustifiably bigger.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 8, 2024 12:03:57 GMT
Load of bollocks
|
|
|
|
Post by acricketer on Aug 8, 2024 13:55:30 GMT
The DOGSO bollocks
|
|
