|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 11:28:17 GMT
sparks No. I think what that shows is how bloody bad the situation is. Everyone knows my opinion on Dykes. I think he’s a poor striker BUT he scores more than Sinclair Armstrong, he plays internationally where he gets great ratings and I think it’s simply a case of the best of a bad bunch. We are weak as piss in the striking department. Also, there is no harm in saying Armstrong Isn’t quite ready yet, he isn’t! Being not quite ready is a fair assessment but plenty of other factors to take into consideration, like service ,style of play and mins played,remember both him and Dykes have scored just once. Some suggesting Dykes currently is a better alternative to Armstrong is imo rubbish as other than bringing inconsistent performances what does Dykes bring to the party? As said above Armstrong has had 2 below par games yet Colback gets fans hanging out his arse despite his obvious flaws in his last 3 games.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2023 11:53:59 GMT
sparks No. I think what that shows is how bloody bad the situation is. Everyone knows my opinion on Dykes. I think he’s a poor striker BUT he scores more than Sinclair Armstrong, he plays internationally where he gets great ratings and I think it’s simply a case of the best of a bad bunch. We are weak as piss in the striking department. Also, there is no harm in saying Armstrong Isn’t quite ready yet, he isn’t! Being not quite ready is a fair assessment but plenty of other factors to take into consideration, like service ,style of play and mins played,remember both him and Dykes have scored just once. Some suggesting Dykes currently is a better alternative to Armstrong is imo rubbish as other than bringing inconsistent performances what does Dykes bring to the party? As said above Armstrong has had 2 below par games yet Colback gets fans hanging out his arse despite his obvious flaws in his last 3 games. The goalscoring stats already show what Dykes brings that Armstrong doesn't. The latter's record is appalling. Armstrong brings more enthusiasm but as harsh as it was articulated above, the poster who said he looks like a kid chasing a balloon was spot on.
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 12:12:24 GMT
What goalscoring stats are you talking about ‘OLDR’ both have got just 1 goal each this season and Armstrong has a nailed on assist.
Armstrong has played every game from memory and other than the last 2 games he’s had a regular impact on the rest of games played with his pace and physicality.
What impact has Dykes had on our games this season other than his goal against Swansea?
This will be the 3rd time I’ve asked this question that both Stan and Jimmy failed to answer!!
What regular attributes does Dykes bring to QPR when he plays?
|
|
|
Post by acricketer on Sept 25, 2023 12:24:08 GMT
Armstrong wouldn't have scored the header that drew with Swansea.
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 12:29:54 GMT
Armstrong wouldn't have scored the header that drew with Swansea. That not 100% certain but would probably agree as Armstrong is seldom seen heading the ball, Would Donkey have outpaced the defenders down the wing to provide an assist for Paals goal?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2023 12:34:09 GMT
What goalscoring stats are you talking about ‘OLDR’ both have got just 1 goal each this season and Armstrong has a nailed on assist. Armstrong has played every game from memory and other than the last 2 games he’s had a regular impact on the rest of games played with his pace and physicality. What impact has Dykes had on our games this season other than his goal against Swansea? This will be the 3rd time I’ve asked this question that both Stan and Jimmy failed to answer!! What regular attributes does Dykes bring to QPR when he plays? Dykes has scored 29 goals for QPR in 119 appearances, Armstrong has scored 1 in 27. That ratio is 1 in 4.1 matches compared to 1 in 27. There is no comparison there. Dykes isn't great but he has proven himself to be of a certain standard which Armstrong hasn't. Form is temporary and all that. And what does Armstrong running around really achieve? I can't help but think of the old adage 'work smarter, not harder' here. I don't think I've read anyone express an opinion that they want Armstrong to fail but if we don't acknowledge that he shouldn't be playing at the level at the moment then it won't just be this season we ruin him but potentially his whole career. However, as Bill rightfully points out, the trouble with that is there isn't a replacement.
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 12:46:52 GMT
What goalscoring stats are you talking about ‘OLDR’ both have got just 1 goal each this season and Armstrong has a nailed on assist. Armstrong has played every game from memory and other than the last 2 games he’s had a regular impact on the rest of games played with his pace and physicality. What impact has Dykes had on our games this season other than his goal against Swansea? This will be the 3rd time I’ve asked this question that both Stan and Jimmy failed to answer!! What regular attributes does Dykes bring to QPR when he plays? Dykes has scored 29 goals for QPR in 119 appearances, Armstrong has scored 1 in 27. That ratio is 1 in 4.1 matches compared to 1 in 27. There is no comparison there. Dykes isn't great but he has proven himself to be of a certain standard which Armstrong hasn't. Form is temporary and all that. And what does Armstrong running around really achieve? I can't help but think of the old adage 'work smarter, not harder' here. I don't think I've read anyone express an opinion that they want Armstrong to fail but if we don't acknowledge that he shouldn't be playing at the level at the moment then it won't just be this season we ruin him but potentially his whole career. However, as Bill rightfully points out, the trouble with that is there isn't a replacement. You are quite correct Dykes isn’t great and of a certain standard he’s fucking shite. My vote on QPR worst ever striker being Dykes was not a protest vote but taken in the right manner. Its rather apt you again failed to describe what Dykes does best for QPR.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2023 12:50:21 GMT
Dykes has scored 29 goals for QPR in 119 appearances, Armstrong has scored 1 in 27. That ratio is 1 in 4.1 matches compared to 1 in 27. There is no comparison there. Dykes isn't great but he has proven himself to be of a certain standard which Armstrong hasn't. Form is temporary and all that. And what does Armstrong running around really achieve? I can't help but think of the old adage 'work smarter, not harder' here. I don't think I've read anyone express an opinion that they want Armstrong to fail but if we don't acknowledge that he shouldn't be playing at the level at the moment then it won't just be this season we ruin him but potentially his whole career. However, as Bill rightfully points out, the trouble with that is there isn't a replacement. You are quite correct Dykes isn’t great and of a certain standard he’s fucking shite. My vote on QPR worst ever striker being Dykes was not a protest vote but taken in the right manner. Its rather apt you again failed to describe what Dykes does best for QPR. Sparks if you think Dykes is the worst striker we've ever had at QPR I envy you missing some absolute dross. He's an average player in a poor team, no more, no less. And you've had stats showing goal ratios. What merit would you use to justify your opinion?
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 12:57:10 GMT
You are quite correct Dykes isn’t great and of a certain standard he’s fucking shite. My vote on QPR worst ever striker being Dykes was not a protest vote but taken in the right manner. Its rather apt you again failed to describe what Dykes does best for QPR. Sparks if you think Dykes is the worst striker we've ever had at QPR I envy you missing some absolute dross. He's an average player in a poor team, no more, no less. And you've had stats showing goal ratios. What merit would you use to justify your opinion? I’ve seen plenty going back to the likes of Alan Wilks, Dykes wins it by a landslide because of how many games he’s played and him being so poor in 99% of them.
|
|
|
Post by Stanley75 on Sept 25, 2023 12:59:13 GMT
And in addition to the above stats
Minutes played per goal this season:
Dykes: 393 Armstrong: 548
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 13:08:10 GMT
And in addition to the above stats Minutes per goal this season: Dykes: 393 Armstrong: 548 How many games has Dykes made an obvious impact? What are Dykes best/regular attributes?
|
|
|
Post by jfrabbit on Sept 25, 2023 13:08:29 GMT
Sparks the stats speak for themselves.
Dykes is wayyyyyy down the list of any striker I want to see playing for QPR but Armstrong’s 1 goal in 27 games tells its own story.
I love his enthusiasm and I will him on to score every single game but tbh he doesn’t look anywhere near the level we’re at.
How many times do you see him actually shoot, get onto headers, run behind and shoot at goal? Hardly ever is the answer.
Again Dykes isn’t Haaland but we know this.
It’s not even a debate. They’re both poor as it stands and we will struggle if we persevere with these two up front.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2023 13:10:55 GMT
Sparks if you think Dykes is the worst striker we've ever had at QPR I envy you missing some absolute dross. He's an average player in a poor team, no more, no less. And you've had stats showing goal ratios. What merit would you use to justify your opinion? I’ve seen plenty going back to the likes of Alan Wilks, Dykes wins it by a landslide because of how many games he’s played and him being so poor in 99% of them. Well, we'll have to agree to disagree as I suspect there's no changing minds here. However, as far as we're allowed to form our own opinions on subjective matters, we're not allowed to choose our own facts. Regardless of how low your opinion of Dykes is he still has a far superior goal scoring record than Armstrong. In fact, the latter has a worse ratio than Mark Hateley (1 in 6.6), Sammy Koejoe (1 in 11.3), Lee Charles (1 in 18) and Eric Sabin (1 in 16), and there is a significant risk that if we don't bring someone else in and use him far more sparingly he will end up still being worse than those. We all want him to succeed.
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 13:12:28 GMT
I’m struggling to believe that you Stanley would stoop to using stats to rip lumps out of a 20yr just starting out, yet in the next breath say ignore that tramp Ainsworth stats for last season.
Think it’s time for a long break from this forum.
|
|
|
Post by jfrabbit on Sept 25, 2023 13:14:33 GMT
I’m struggling to believe that you Stanley would stoop to using stats to rip lumps out of a 20yr just starting out, yet in the next breath say ignore that tramp Ainsworth stats for last season. Think it’s time for a long break from this forum. Wow 😳 I can only see a balanced, fair and open debate here sparks mate. No one is ripping lumps out of anyone.
|
|
|
Post by Stanley75 on Sept 25, 2023 13:27:15 GMT
I’m struggling to believe that you Stanley would stoop to using stats to rip lumps out of a 20yr just starting out, yet in the next breath say ignore that tramp Ainsworth stats for last season. I've done no such thing and that's a straw man argument if ever there was one Sparks. I would love just as much as any fan for Armstrong to succeed as I've made clear many times. All I have done here is pinpoint his strengths and areas he still needs to work on.
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 13:58:21 GMT
I’m struggling to believe that you Stanley would stoop to using stats to rip lumps out of a 20yr just starting out, yet in the next breath say ignore that tramp Ainsworth stats for last season. I've done no such that and that's a straw man argument if ever there was one Sparks. I would love just as much as any fan for Armstrong to succeed as I've made clear many times. All I have done here is pinpoint his strengths and areas he still needs to work on. You and others have failed to answer my question about what does Dykes bring to QPR, why is that? At what point is it fair to say to ignore Ainsworth horrendous stats from last season yet you decide it’s fine for you to incorporate Armstrongs stats from last season? You may call it a straw man argument but I will call it selective use of previous info on both individuals. This isn’t about wether I doubt you or anyone here wants Armstrong to succeed it’s about being perfectly fair and measured with the criticism he’s getting for 2 below games where the whole team have been poor.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2023 14:05:47 GMT
I've done no such that and that's a straw man argument if ever there was one Sparks. I would love just as much as any fan for Armstrong to succeed as I've made clear many times. All I have done here is pinpoint his strengths and areas he still needs to work on. You and others have failed to answer my question about what does Dykes bring to QPR, why is that? At what point is it fair to say it’s ok to ignore Ainsworth horrendous stats from last season yet you decide it’s fine for you to incorporate Armstrongs stats from last season? You may call it a straw man argument but I will call it selective use of previous info on both individuals. This isn’t about wether I doubt you or anyone here wants Armstrong to succeed it’s about being perfectly fair and measured with the criticism he’s getting for 2 below games where the whole team have been poor. But, Sparks, you've been shown that Dykes has a ratio of 1 goal in 4 compared to Armstrong's 1 in 27. Why can't you acknowledge that that is a far superior record and THAT is what he brings...
|
|
|
Post by Stanley75 on Sept 25, 2023 14:11:59 GMT
You and others have failed to answer my question about what does Dykes bring to QPR, why is that? I/we have answered it. But just to be clear - Lyndon Dykes, as shit as he is for QPR, has a less shit scoring ratio than Sinclair Armstrong and, as we know, goal scoring is ultimately what strikers are judged on. You are taking that as me criticising Armstrong, which I'm not, because I have made very clear that he is a young player who is still learning and developing and I very much hope that continues so he can start banging them in for us on a more regular basis. At what point is it fair to say it’s ok to ignore Ainsworth horrendous stats from last season yet you decide it’s fine for you to incorporate Armstrongs stats from last season? I didn't. They were not from last season. I already said they are Armstrong's stats for this season. And re Ainsworth - that was a totally separate debate on a separate thread.
|
|
|
Post by Corbray on Sept 25, 2023 14:17:05 GMT
he literally turned 20 only 3 months ago. ask yourself this, is he better this season compared to last? absolutely.
he will only get better and i've said it since the start but the boy will be a prem player one day.
i can remember people slagging off eze as just a luxury player when he first broke into the side but hes gone on to do alright.
give him time, thats all we can do and he'll come good. the guy has all the attributes needed for a modern day striker but is still learning and needs experience.
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 14:26:48 GMT
But, Sparks, you've been shown that Dykes has a ratio of 1 goal in 4 compared to Armstrong's 1 in 27. Why can't you acknowledge that that is a far superior record and THAT is what he brings... What don’t you understand about bringing a 20yr into his first season in men’s football as a first team starter. Dykes has been playing men’s football for at least 5 years, Armstrong has been doing the same for 1 yr so allowances need to be made to see if Armstrong progresses. Your opinion that Dykes is the better option is not the same as mine, even at this early stage of his development Armstrong offers far more than Donkey imo. I’m glad your not our manager if you can come to a firm decision that Armstrong is crap after 2 poor games, yet think that Dykes is the better option after 3yrs of being a Donkey here.
|
|
|
Post by gtleighsr3 on Sept 25, 2023 14:41:01 GMT
As Essex United Nations representative I urge peace to breakout on this thread, take 5, have a breather, kitkat and all calm the fuck down. Or I will be forced to send a peace keeping force in made up of Bangladeshi and Togo finest to sort it.
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Sept 25, 2023 14:43:13 GMT
If Armstrong was a proper goal scorer he really should have three more goals to his name in the last two games alone.
The miss first half against Swansea. No defender near him, no pressure and he failed to even hit the target! missed the goal entirely from 10yards no defence can be made for that.
Birmingham and some might say I’m being harsh, but first half Ruddy parry’s ball in six yard box and it’s free for couple of seconds. Once it’s free that should be buried. Second half ruddy parry’s again hits field goes wide. Armstrong should be all over the ball from the first parry before keeper gets chance claw it into field. These are easy pickings for out and out strikers.
Offer those three chances to billy sharp and he scores three times. Armstrong don’t smell goals and I don’t think you can coach that.
I don’t think he’s shit overall, far from it, but it’s clear as day he’s not a forward as he don’t have the composure or the instinct. Sooner club accepts this quicker they can do the lad a service and work with making him better player in his right position, probably out wide, and then get a proper striker in.
|
|
|
Post by West Acton on Sept 25, 2023 14:48:58 GMT
But, Sparks, you've been shown that Dykes has a ratio of 1 goal in 4 compared to Armstrong's 1 in 27. Why can't you acknowledge that that is a far superior record and THAT is what he brings... What don’t you understand about bringing a 20yr into his first season in men’s football as a first team starter. . hence why he should have been out on loan honing his skills in a less pressurised environment building his confidence and learning his trade.
|
|
|
Post by gtleighsr3 on Sept 25, 2023 14:52:22 GMT
Look at difference between him and that Fulham lad at brum. One is built like a garage, the other a natural goal scorer
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 14:54:18 GMT
You and others have failed to answer my question about what does Dykes bring to QPR, why is that? I/we have answered it. But just to be clear - Lyndon Dykes, as shit as he is for QPR, has a less shit scoring ratio than Sinclair Armstrong and, as we know, goal scoring is ultimately what strikers are judged on. You are taking that as me criticising Armstrong, which I'm not, because I have made very clear that he is a young player who is still learning and developing and I very much hope that continues so he can start banging them in for us on a more regular basis. At what point is it fair to say it’s ok to ignore Ainsworth horrendous stats from last season yet you decide it’s fine for you to incorporate Armstrongs stats from last season? I didn't. They were not from last season. I already said they are Armstrong's stats for this season. And re Ainsworth - that was a totally separate debate on a separate thread. If some are now going to use goals per min as a gauge to judge ability there’s very little difference between the 2 as there is less than one game and a half between them. i prefer to use my eyes to judge a player rather than stats. Finally ,Not my idea of being fair to suggest to disregard any of Ainsworth stats and then for you to post Armstrongs irrespective of it being a different thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2023 14:59:51 GMT
But, Sparks, you've been shown that Dykes has a ratio of 1 goal in 4 compared to Armstrong's 1 in 27. Why can't you acknowledge that that is a far superior record and THAT is what he brings... What don’t you understand about bringing a 20yr into his first season in men’s football as a first team starter. Dykes has been playing men’s football for at least 5 years, Armstrong has been doing the same for 1 yr so allowances need to be made to see if Armstrong progresses. Your opinion that Dykes is the better option is not the same as mine, even at this early stage of his development Armstrong offers far more than Donkey imo. I’m glad your not our manager if you can come to a firm decision that Armstrong is crap after 2 poor games, yet think that Dykes is the better option after 3yrs of being a Donkey here. We agree that he's not ready for this yet due to his youth and has been forced into this situation due to the mismanagement of the club in general. No one is saying that he won't make it, in fact, most posters are saying what they want to see happen to allow him to fulfill his potential. However, part of that dialogue revolves around his goal scoring record which is awful. Regardless of the reasons why it is so poor, and we would probably agree it is due to his age and lack of experience, we can't pretend it doesn't exist. You asked what people think Dykes adds to the team that Armstrong doesn't and have been pointed in their respective goal ratio records by a number of persons. Dykes scores a QPR goal once every four matches, Armstrong once every 27. It's a results business and if we don't score goals we don't win and if we don't win we go down. Nobody thinks Dykes is great, nobody knows for certain whether or not Armstrong will prove himself to be a better player. But we can only express facts that exist and the facts state quite clearly and without any ambiguity that Lydon Dykes is more statistically likely to score than Sinclair Armstrong. THAT'S what he brings to the team.
|
|
|
Post by hubble on Sept 25, 2023 15:05:38 GMT
I don't think Armstrong is ever going to be the new Les, but I absolutely do think that he will get better. As Sparks has said, he's been thrown in at the deep end, with poor service in a team that is struggling to right itself and is still going through a root and branch transformation. Therefore it's very unfair to judge him on pure stats so far without taking all that into account.
At the same time, I think Dykes is a bit better than he's generally being described on here, not much, I'll grant you, but again, it's all about service. One decent cross v Swansea and bang, what a goal. If the service improves, so will both their stats. Armstrong is raw and still needs time to develop, but I think he'll get better. Yes, it's a pretty shitty strikeforce and Kelman is a complete non-started as far as I'm concerned, but folks, it's the only strikeforce we've got! So you can weep and wail all you like about it, but that ain't gonna change.
|
|
|
Post by sparks on Sept 25, 2023 15:08:18 GMT
What don’t you understand about bringing a 20yr into his first season in men’s football as a first team starter. Dykes has been playing men’s football for at least 5 years, Armstrong has been doing the same for 1 yr so allowances need to be made to see if Armstrong progresses. Your opinion that Dykes is the better option is not the same as mine, even at this early stage of his development Armstrong offers far more than Donkey imo. I’m glad your not our manager if you can come to a firm decision that Armstrong is crap after 2 poor games, yet think that Dykes is the better option after 3yrs of being a Donkey here. We agree that he's not ready for this yet due to his youth and has been forced into this situation due to the mismanagement of the club in general. No one is saying that he won't make it, in fact, most posters are saying what they want to see happen to allow him to fulfill his potential. However, part of that dialogue revolves around his goal scoring record which is awful. Regardless of the reasons why it is so poor, and we would probably agree it is due to his age and lack of experience, we can't pretend it doesn't exist. You asked what people think Dykes adds to the team that Armstrong doesn't and have been pointed in their respective goal ratio records by a number of persons. Dykes scores a QPR goal once every four matches, Armstrong once every 27. It's a results business and if we don't score goals we don't win and if we don't win we go down. Nobody thinks Dykes is great, nobody knows for certain whether or not Armstrong will prove himself to be a better player. But we can only express facts that exist and the facts state quite clearly and without any ambiguity that Lydon Dykes is more statistically likely to score than Sinclair Armstrong. THAT'S what he brings to the team. You can agree to whatever you want, no one is convincing me that Dykes is a average striker , he’s fucking shit mate.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2023 15:11:25 GMT
We agree that he's not ready for this yet due to his youth and has been forced into this situation due to the mismanagement of the club in general. No one is saying that he won't make it, in fact, most posters are saying what they want to see happen to allow him to fulfill his potential. However, part of that dialogue revolves around his goal scoring record which is awful. Regardless of the reasons why it is so poor, and we would probably agree it is due to his age and lack of experience, we can't pretend it doesn't exist. You asked what people think Dykes adds to the team that Armstrong doesn't and have been pointed in their respective goal ratio records by a number of persons. Dykes scores a QPR goal once every four matches, Armstrong once every 27. It's a results business and if we don't score goals we don't win and if we don't win we go down. Nobody thinks Dykes is great, nobody knows for certain whether or not Armstrong will prove himself to be a better player. But we can only express facts that exist and the facts state quite clearly and without any ambiguity that Lydon Dykes is more statistically likely to score than Sinclair Armstrong. THAT'S what he brings to the team. You can agree to whatever you want, no one is convincing me that Dykes is a average striker , he’s fucking shit mate. That's an opinion which many will agree with and many won't. All everyone is asking is that you don't ignore facts and at the moment it is factually correct to say that he is our most likely striker to score. As much as it pains me to say - and I imagine it hits you harder- he is the best we have upfront at the moment.
|
|